|
mkkulture (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
wtf? have you seen the news or been outside lately? this global house of cards is teetering and they want to add more cards!
Jarodahl (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The best thing that she says on here is what she said concerning people gathering around elections and partisan politics instead of real issues. This is most important now with way too many people sucked into complacency by Obama's win.
MCfresca (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
==WARNING: CRAZY ALERT!==Naomi, you are so drunk with your own delusional vision of globalized damnation that Dick Cheney would avoid walking by you in a hallway. I can hear him say, "That bitch is CRAY-ZAY, man."
AirelonTrading (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
No ... not jailed for a thought. Jailed for espousing others to commit a crime. She is espousing STEALING from the public. That is the public encouragement for ones to commit a crime.
ghochkeppel (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Jailed for an idea? Ever read 1984? That's Thought Crime. If your mind is so closed as to leap to "communism" any time an alternative to the current system is proposed. If you think there are no similarities between totalitarianism and the modern corporate state, you're not trying very hard. Relax your grip on calcified ideas, and listen.
AirelonTrading (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
No, she needs jailed for encouraging the public to steal from others.In the United States, if you encourage others to commit a crime, then you're guilty of a crime.And WHY IN THE NAME OF GOD is a Canadian trying to dictate U.S. Policy? There's a ticket to persona non grata
mdsimontam (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
She should be jailed for disagreeing with you. You´re quite the democrat yourself.
AirelonTrading (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The only point I'd disagree here, is that it's pretty easy to determine who is doing what. But then again, I'm an investor, and I do that full time. It's why XOM is not in my portfolio, and neither is Walmart.But other than that? I agree completely. A government is supposed to protect it's citizens. That's all. That's all Adam Smith preached in the "Wealth of Nations". He hated when Govt tried to play "merchant".
krissy4nik (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The problem is with some corporations ( we done know how many) is that these corporations are devouring the more honest corporations through mergers because they have the finances and the power. So if this system is going to work ( and unlike klien i believe it can) we need regulations and requirements. I still think her aim is admirable and she makes many good points.
AirelonTrading (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Instead, the looters become the government with SOME corporations |
